Bujumbura and Lake Tanganyika shore, long-rains with high lake levels. Lakeshore and urban communities exposed to prolonged flooding. You are the DOC duty analyst as the forecast window opens.
Act I quiz — build the evidence inventory Every answer becomes an input to the risk model: evidence → classification → confidence → belief update → decision. Not scored.
Q1. The rainfall outlook for Bujumbura comes from the ECMWF ensemble (many parallel model runs, updated daily). First, the basics: what is a DETERMINISTIC forecast? A single model run giving one outcome — no range of possibilities Many model runs combined into probabilities A forecast that is always correct An observation of what has already happened BN purpose: Forecast literacy — why a single number is not enough for risk decisions.
Q2. And what is an ENSEMBLE prediction system (EPS)? The same model run many times from slightly different starting conditions, giving a spread of outcomes Several forecasters voting on the most likely outcome One model run at a higher resolution An average of past observed seasons BN purpose: Why forecasts are SOFT evidence in the BN — the spread is the confidence.
Q3. What is the strongest evidence currently available? On your desk this round: 7-day antecedent rainfall (IMERG) · Ensemble-mean exceedance prob (ECMWF P_heavy)
Forecast Observation Community report Historical analogue BN purpose: Determines which BN node receives the highest weight.
Q4. Classify that evidence. Check the tags on the evidence cards: 7-day antecedent rainfall (IMERG) · Ensemble-mean exceedance prob (ECMWF P_heavy)
Hard Soft Virtual BN purpose: Determines confidence weighting — hard = observation (one-hot), soft = probability vector, virtual = likelihood message.
Q5. How reliable is this evidence? Bujumbura is a TAIL-risk case — the ensemble mean can look benign while a few members carry the danger; weigh the tail, not the average. Reliability sets how hard the BN leans on it.
Very Low Low Moderate High Very High BN purpose: Evidence likelihood weighting.
Q6. What hazard condition does this evidence support in Bujumbura, Burundi? Which mechanism fits Bujumbura — slow river rise, sudden flash runoff, or urban-drainage overload? The mechanism decides which impacts follow.
Heavy rainfall River flooding Flash flooding No hazard BN purpose: Updates the hazard node.
Q7. Which impact pathway is most likely here? Bujumbura and Lake Tanganyika shore, long-rains with high lake levels. Lakeshore and urban communities exposed to prolonged flooding. You are the DOC duty analyst as the forecast window opens.
Population displacement Road disruption Crop loss Water contamination BN purpose: Updates the impact node.
Q8. What evidence would you request next? Still off the table this round: Ensemble-max / 2-yr RP (pixel p95) · Spatial coverage of heavy-rain pixels · Yesterday's posterior carried forward (DBN, alpha=0.6) · Observed rainfall / river response. Which would most reduce your uncertainty before you decide?
Satellite observations Gauge observations Hydrological model Field assessment Exposure information BN purpose: Real DOC operations seek more evidence — watch which cards the Act II rounds reveal.
Q9. As the April 2024 long rains get under way, Lake Tanganyika is already well above its long-term mean for the time of year, after El Nino-enhanced short rains and several years of rising levels. Why does this pre-existing lake state change the flood risk picture for Bujumbura's lakeshore? A lake is a very slow-draining reservoir.
It does not; lake level only matters after a storm A high lake has no buffer left, so continued seasonal inflow pushes water into lakeshore districts and keeps it there for weeks, unlike a quick flash flood High lake levels reduce flood risk because waves are smaller Lake level only affects shipping, not flooding BN purpose: Why a slowly varying antecedent state (lake level) can dominate risk even when the daily forecast looks modest.
Q10. Which large-scale climate context, already known to analysts months before April 2024, primed western Burundi for this long-rains season? The same regional anomaly was loading Kenya, Tanzania and Somalia at the same time.
The 2023-24 El Nino plus a strongly positive Indian Ocean Dipole, which had already enhanced the late-2023 short rains and pre-saturated the basin A multi-year La Nina drought A tropical cyclone making landfall on Lake Tanganyika Snowmelt from the Rwenzori mountains BN purpose: How seasonal climate-driver knowledge stacks with antecedent wetness to lift the flood prior before any storm forecast.
Q11. Your current risk estimate — before the model runs? Bujumbura is a TAIL-risk case — the ensemble mean can look benign while a few members carry the danger; weigh the tail, not the average. No model has spoken yet — commit your own read so Act III can compare it to the engine.
Low Moderate High Very High BN purpose: Your pre-BN estimate. Act III compares it against the engine risk indication.
Q12. Recommended DOC status — commit now, before seeing the BN output. The ensemble mean may look benign but the tail signal is rising ahead of onset. What DOC level do you set, and why? A 'Watch + re-check + note the tail uncertainty' is a strong answer.
Monitor Watch Warning Emergency Coordination BN purpose: Your pre-BN decision. Act III compares it against the CRMA state.
Q13. The risk model you are about to work with was built from expert rules, not calibrated against decades of events. How much should you trust it? No right answer — your stance is revisited in Act III against what the model actually did, and what history recorded.
Fully — it computes probabilities Not at all — rules are subjective As a transparent colleague — consistent and inspectable, but encoded judgment BN purpose: Hold this question. Act III returns to it.